TRUE SELF TREATING THE FALSE SELF?
If you begin to examine yourself through sincere awareness, you will see things you have never seen before. In almost all cases, the things you believe you are (are not you). They have nothing in common with your True Self the inner aspect of who you really are. In fact, each of those things... images, ideas and thoughts are the very culprits of your pain and frustration.
“We have the choice of two identities: the external mask which seems to be real...and the hidden, inner person who seems to us to be nothing, but who can give himself eternally to the truth in whom he subsists.” ― Thomas Merton, New Seeds of Contemplation
“We have the choice of two identities: the external mask which seems to be real...and the hidden, inner person who seems to us to be nothing, but who can give himself eternally to the truth in whom he subsists.” ― Thomas Merton, New Seeds of Contemplation
WHAT IS THE TRUE SELF?
(Defined for the main article linked above EIT).
THE True Self and false self are terms to describe a sense of self based on spontaneous authentic experience, a sense of all out personal aliveness or feeling real.
WHAT IS THE FALSE SELF?
The False Self is a defense designed to protect the True Self by hiding it. A False Self was what allowed a person to present a polite and mannered attitude in public.
But for more serious emotional problems (in some patients), patients who seemed unable to feel spontaneous, alive or real to themselves in any part of their lives, yet managed to put on a successful "show of being real". Such patients suffered inwardly from a sense of being empty, dead or phoney.
The 'True Self' is sometimes referred to as the Real Core Self.
People who are struggling with this false 'self' and the issues the false self creates (out of their subconscious) listed above must understand & get deep enough to get between the gap in thought found between the two selfs...
NOTE: This struggle to find the Truth Self can be blocked by the false psychological core of “arrested emotional development”...AKA...false self.
More about this linked above...
By RESOLVING ARRESTED EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENTAL ISSUES
YOU CREATE THE SPACE FOR THE TRUE SELF TO EMERGE...
For the treatment method I recommend click AND READ the “Emotional Intelligence Therapy” linked above.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTES:
Actual self and incorrect (false) self are conditions provided into psychoanalysis by D. W. Winnicott in 1960. Winnicott used the phrase "True Self" to explain a sensation of self depending on natural authentic encounter, a sensation of "all-out individual aliveness" or "feeling real".
The "False Self" was, for Winnicott, a protection developed to secure the Actual Self by covering it. He believed that in wellness, a False Self was what permitted a individual to existing a "polite and behaved attitude" in community.But he saw more serious psychological issues in sufferers who seemed incapable to experience natural, in existence or real to themselves in any aspect of their lifestyles, yet handled to put on a effective "show of being real". Such sufferers experienced inwardly from a sensation of being vacant, deceased or "phoney".
The true self is sometimes termed as the "real self" in some written materials by Winnicott.
Before MR. Winnicott[
There was much in psychoanalytic concept on which Winnicott could sketch for his concept of the False Self. Helene Deutsch had described the "as if" individualities who have 'succeeded in replacing "pseudo contacts" of numerous types for a proper sensation of get in touch with with other people: they act "as if" they have sensation connections with people'. Winnicott's own specialist, Joan Riviere, had memorably researched the concept of the masquerade - of 'the cover up of the narcissist..."the feature of deceptiveness, the cover up, which covers this simple booking of all management under perceptive rationalizations, or under feigned complying and trivial politeness"'. Freud himself, with his delayed concept of 'the ego as constituted in its nucleus by a sequence of offending identifications',had developed a concept of 'the Ego, which does keep some evaluation with the False Self'. Erich Fromm, in his The Worry of Freedom recognized between unique self and pseudo self, the latter being a way to evade the solitude of freedom, at the cost of dropping the unique self.
Carl Rogers had individually outlined Kierkegaard's much previously declare that 'the inner way of hopelessness is to select "to be another than himself". However "to will to be that self which one truly is, is indeed the other of hopelessness," and this option is the inner liability of man'.
Winnicott's conception
Despite its many antecedents, it would be incorrect to ignore the silent conceptual trend provided by Winnicott's 1960 content, which provided a clean and powerful, medically centered image of the person thoughts.
For Winnicott, in the False Self, 'Other individuals objectives can become of overriding significance, addressing or contradicting the unique sensation of self, the one linked with the very origins of the being'. Winnicott believed that such an excessive type of False Self developed in beginnings, as a protection against an atmosphere that sensed risky or frustrating because of a deficiency of reasonably attuned caregiving. Winnicott used the phrase "good enough" to make reference to what he believed of as maximum parenting; he believed that infants need mom and father who are usually psychologically attuned and able to sympathize with the child, but not completely so. The risk is that 'through this False Self, the baby makes up a incorrect set of connections, and through introjections even reaches a display of being real'. The outcome can be a 'child whose prospective aliveness and creativeness has gone unseen...concealing an vacant, dry inner globe behind a cover up of independence'. Yet simultaneously the 'Winnicottian False Self is the greatest defense against the impossible "exploitation of the Actual Self, which would outcome in its annihilation"'.
By evaluation, the Actual Self is centered in, and '"does no more than gather together information of the encounter of aliveness" - this implies your life-sustaining features, "including the heart's activity and breathing"'... Out of this the child makes the encounter of reality: a sensation that '"Life is worthwhile of living". In the child's non-verbal action which '... conveys a natural instinct', the actual self prospective can be conveyed to, and confirmed by, the motherer.
'The False Self in its pathological guise stops and stops what Winnicott calling the "spontaneous gesture" of the Actual Self. Compliance and replica are the expensive results'. Some would indeed consider that 'the concept of complying is main to Winnicott's concept of the incorrect self', and add, paradoxically, that 'concern for an item is quickly a certified act'. Where the motherer is not tuned in to the child's humorousness, where instead 'a mom's objectives are too insistent, they can gradually outcome in certified behavior and an affected autonomy', as the child has 'to handle a ahead of your energy and effort essential item....The False Self enacts a type of dissociated respect or identification of the object; the item is taken seriously, is proven problem, but not by a person'.
It has been recommended that 'in pathology, Winnicott's distinction between "true and incorrect selves" matches to Balint's "basic fault" and to Fairbairn's "compromised ego"'. However, Winnicott's concept is at periods criticised for not being in theory incorporated. Neville Sympington writes: "Most physicians ... when they have a medical understanding, they basically insert it onto current concept. ... Winnicott did the same with the actual and incorrect self: he did not ask himself how the concept fixed with ego and id." In the same way Jean-Bertrand Pontalis and Maud Mannoni are very arranged about the theoretical effects of Winnicott's true/false self distinction, but they recognize the rights of his medical findings.
The last half-century have seen Winnicott's concepts prolonged and used in a wide variety of situations, both in psychoanalysis and beyond.
Heinz Kohut
It has been recommended that 'Kohut provides basically the same program' as Winnicott in his explanations of 'the narcissistic conditions in which he is an expert....Like Winnicott's "false-self" sufferers, these sufferers make a poor armour (of a "defensive" or "compensatory" character) around their maimed inner core'.[25] Kohut himself 'has mentioned that his perform "overlaps" with Winnicott's investigations', and others have 'regarded Kohut's participation to psychoanalysis to be an expansion of Winnicott's work'.
Thus Kohut emphasises that 'to be...the servicing of even the infected remains of the self is much better not being, that is, to agree to the takeover of another person's personality rather than his definitely elicited responsiveness'. In the same way, he pressured that 'there is a major distinction between the assistance of selfobjects that are preferred and selected by a self in balance with its inner values...and the leaving of yourself to a international self, through which one benefits obtained communication at the cost of authentic effort and innovative participation in life'.
Alexander Lowen recognized narcissists as having a proper and a incorrect, or trivial, self. The incorrect self sets on the outer lining area, as the self provided to the globe. It appears contrary to the actual self, which exists behind the act or image. This true self is the sensation self, but it is a self that must be invisible and declined. Since the trivial self symbolizes distribution and complying, the inner or true self is edgy and upset. This actual revolt and rage can never be completely under management since it is an appearance of the lifestyle power in that individual. But because of the refusal, it cannot be indicated straight. Instead it reveals up in the narcissist's performing out. And it can become a perverse power.
Wayne F. Masterson
James F. Masterson suggested that all the personality conditions vitally include the problem between a person's two “selves”: the incorrect self, which the very toddler constructs to please the mom, and the actual self. The psychiatric treatment of personality conditions is an make an effort to put individuals returning touching their real selves.
Neville Symington
Jungians have researched how 'the narcissistic longings of moms (or fathers) to generate proven wonder through their children' can outcome in a scenario where 'in position of independence, the mature...would come to follow an inner resource that the psychoanalyst Neville Symington calling the "discordant source"'.[30] Symington compared 'two poles: one in which I am the resource of my own activity, where I have a innovative potential that comes from my own resource of activity, and the other in which an inner determine compared to myself is the resource of activity.[31] He known as the double 'sources of activity the "autonomous source" and the "discordant source"', and recognized that 'although the ingredients is different, it is along the collections of what Winnicott speaks about - the actual self and the incorrect self'.
His primary critique of Winnicott involved the preliminary adopting or internalisation of the discordant resource - seeking 'to pressure that an deliberate identification is what triggers the putting on of the incorrect self. Winnicott basically omits this deliberate element in his information of its origins'.
Alice Miller & Alice Burns (psychologist)
In contradistinction to the relatively positive studying of Winnicott, whereby 'the analytic process is to provide the "true self", which can experience and is cowering behind the "false self", which cannot, the durability to appear...like a butterfly separated from its chrysalis',[34] Alice Burns alerts more very carefully that 'it would be incorrect to suggest that there is a completely developed, true self knowingly invisible behind the incorrect self. The essential factor is that the kid does not know what he is hiding'.[35] She does however consider that, when 'the true self is liberated' efficiently, 'where there had been only afraid lonliness or similarly terrifying special dreams, an surprising prosperity of power is now discovered'.[36]
Susie Orbach: incorrect bodies
Susie Orbach saw the incorrect self as an overdevelopment (under parent pressure) of certain factors of the self at the cost of other factors - of the complete prospective of the self - generating thereby an abiding mistrust of what comes out automatically from the person himself or herself.[37]
Orbach went on to make Winnicott's consideration of how ecological failing can cause to an inner splitting of thoughts and body[38] so as to improve his concept of the False Self into that of the False Body - a falsified sensation of the own individual body.
Orbach saw the women incorrect individual body in particular as developed upon identifications with others, at the cost of an inner sensation of validity and stability. Separating a monolithic but incorrect body-sense in the procedure of treatment could allow for the appearance of a variety of authentic (even if often painful) individual body emotions in the person.
Jungian persona
Carl Jung
Jungians have researched 'to what level Jung's concept of the personality overlaps with Winnicott's concept of the False Self' - observing the way 'the antecedents of such persona-identification in the person's life-history are usually quite just like those of the False Self'.[42] However most would believe the fact that it is only 'when the personality is extremely firm or protecting...[that] the personality then produces into a pathological incorrect self'.[43]
Stern's tripartite self
In The Public Realm of the Infant, Daniel Strict regarded 'the sensation of actual communication (..."going on being", in Winnicott's term)' as essential to what he known as the Primary Self - offering 'an effective core to the prerepresentational self'. He also researched how particular expectant moms attunement could make 'two editions of truth....Language becomes available to ratify the divided and consult the blessed position of spoken reflection upon the incorrect self', so that 'the true self becomes a corporation unfortunatly of disavowed encounters of self which cannot be linguistically coded'.
However 'in position of true self and incorrect self, Strict indicates the adopting of a tri-partite vocabulary: the social self, the individual self and the disavowed self'.
#1 Literary examples
In I Never Guaranteed You a Increased Lawn, the heroine's specialist describes to her mom and father that 'she developed a software that went through the activities of truth, and behind it the actual individual attracted further and further away'. The heroine herself could only consider of "normality" with regards to the incorrect self as 'a lethargic freezing phantom flexing her every power to the Semblance'.
It has been recommended of Wuthering Levels that 'the interaction of the actual and incorrect self, and particularly the battle of the actual self to crack forth, make the actual intuitive dilemma of Brontë's novel'.
Foucault, a thinker, took problem with the concept of a “true self” on the reasons that the self was a build, not (as in the Loving paradigm) an essential to be uncovered: anti-essentialism. Foucault mentioned that "In the Californian conspiracy of the self, one is expected to find a person's true self, to individual it from what might unknown or push away it" - whereas for him what was in query was a procedure of subjectification, an appearance of self-formation.
Foucault handled that because "the self is not given to us....there is only one realistic consequence: we have to make ourselves as a perform of art".
See also:
Alter ego
Authenticity (philosophy)
Character mask
Crystallized self
Fantasy bond
Mask
Narcissism
Parentification
Psychology of self
Religious opinions on the self
Unthought known
(Defined for the main article linked above EIT).
THE True Self and false self are terms to describe a sense of self based on spontaneous authentic experience, a sense of all out personal aliveness or feeling real.
WHAT IS THE FALSE SELF?
The False Self is a defense designed to protect the True Self by hiding it. A False Self was what allowed a person to present a polite and mannered attitude in public.
But for more serious emotional problems (in some patients), patients who seemed unable to feel spontaneous, alive or real to themselves in any part of their lives, yet managed to put on a successful "show of being real". Such patients suffered inwardly from a sense of being empty, dead or phoney.
The 'True Self' is sometimes referred to as the Real Core Self.
People who are struggling with this false 'self' and the issues the false self creates (out of their subconscious) listed above must understand & get deep enough to get between the gap in thought found between the two selfs...
NOTE: This struggle to find the Truth Self can be blocked by the false psychological core of “arrested emotional development”...AKA...false self.
More about this linked above...
By RESOLVING ARRESTED EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENTAL ISSUES
YOU CREATE THE SPACE FOR THE TRUE SELF TO EMERGE...
For the treatment method I recommend click AND READ the “Emotional Intelligence Therapy” linked above.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTES:
Actual self and incorrect (false) self are conditions provided into psychoanalysis by D. W. Winnicott in 1960. Winnicott used the phrase "True Self" to explain a sensation of self depending on natural authentic encounter, a sensation of "all-out individual aliveness" or "feeling real".
The "False Self" was, for Winnicott, a protection developed to secure the Actual Self by covering it. He believed that in wellness, a False Self was what permitted a individual to existing a "polite and behaved attitude" in community.But he saw more serious psychological issues in sufferers who seemed incapable to experience natural, in existence or real to themselves in any aspect of their lifestyles, yet handled to put on a effective "show of being real". Such sufferers experienced inwardly from a sensation of being vacant, deceased or "phoney".
The true self is sometimes termed as the "real self" in some written materials by Winnicott.
Before MR. Winnicott[
There was much in psychoanalytic concept on which Winnicott could sketch for his concept of the False Self. Helene Deutsch had described the "as if" individualities who have 'succeeded in replacing "pseudo contacts" of numerous types for a proper sensation of get in touch with with other people: they act "as if" they have sensation connections with people'. Winnicott's own specialist, Joan Riviere, had memorably researched the concept of the masquerade - of 'the cover up of the narcissist..."the feature of deceptiveness, the cover up, which covers this simple booking of all management under perceptive rationalizations, or under feigned complying and trivial politeness"'. Freud himself, with his delayed concept of 'the ego as constituted in its nucleus by a sequence of offending identifications',had developed a concept of 'the Ego, which does keep some evaluation with the False Self'. Erich Fromm, in his The Worry of Freedom recognized between unique self and pseudo self, the latter being a way to evade the solitude of freedom, at the cost of dropping the unique self.
Carl Rogers had individually outlined Kierkegaard's much previously declare that 'the inner way of hopelessness is to select "to be another than himself". However "to will to be that self which one truly is, is indeed the other of hopelessness," and this option is the inner liability of man'.
Winnicott's conception
Despite its many antecedents, it would be incorrect to ignore the silent conceptual trend provided by Winnicott's 1960 content, which provided a clean and powerful, medically centered image of the person thoughts.
For Winnicott, in the False Self, 'Other individuals objectives can become of overriding significance, addressing or contradicting the unique sensation of self, the one linked with the very origins of the being'. Winnicott believed that such an excessive type of False Self developed in beginnings, as a protection against an atmosphere that sensed risky or frustrating because of a deficiency of reasonably attuned caregiving. Winnicott used the phrase "good enough" to make reference to what he believed of as maximum parenting; he believed that infants need mom and father who are usually psychologically attuned and able to sympathize with the child, but not completely so. The risk is that 'through this False Self, the baby makes up a incorrect set of connections, and through introjections even reaches a display of being real'. The outcome can be a 'child whose prospective aliveness and creativeness has gone unseen...concealing an vacant, dry inner globe behind a cover up of independence'. Yet simultaneously the 'Winnicottian False Self is the greatest defense against the impossible "exploitation of the Actual Self, which would outcome in its annihilation"'.
By evaluation, the Actual Self is centered in, and '"does no more than gather together information of the encounter of aliveness" - this implies your life-sustaining features, "including the heart's activity and breathing"'... Out of this the child makes the encounter of reality: a sensation that '"Life is worthwhile of living". In the child's non-verbal action which '... conveys a natural instinct', the actual self prospective can be conveyed to, and confirmed by, the motherer.
'The False Self in its pathological guise stops and stops what Winnicott calling the "spontaneous gesture" of the Actual Self. Compliance and replica are the expensive results'. Some would indeed consider that 'the concept of complying is main to Winnicott's concept of the incorrect self', and add, paradoxically, that 'concern for an item is quickly a certified act'. Where the motherer is not tuned in to the child's humorousness, where instead 'a mom's objectives are too insistent, they can gradually outcome in certified behavior and an affected autonomy', as the child has 'to handle a ahead of your energy and effort essential item....The False Self enacts a type of dissociated respect or identification of the object; the item is taken seriously, is proven problem, but not by a person'.
It has been recommended that 'in pathology, Winnicott's distinction between "true and incorrect selves" matches to Balint's "basic fault" and to Fairbairn's "compromised ego"'. However, Winnicott's concept is at periods criticised for not being in theory incorporated. Neville Sympington writes: "Most physicians ... when they have a medical understanding, they basically insert it onto current concept. ... Winnicott did the same with the actual and incorrect self: he did not ask himself how the concept fixed with ego and id." In the same way Jean-Bertrand Pontalis and Maud Mannoni are very arranged about the theoretical effects of Winnicott's true/false self distinction, but they recognize the rights of his medical findings.
The last half-century have seen Winnicott's concepts prolonged and used in a wide variety of situations, both in psychoanalysis and beyond.
Heinz Kohut
It has been recommended that 'Kohut provides basically the same program' as Winnicott in his explanations of 'the narcissistic conditions in which he is an expert....Like Winnicott's "false-self" sufferers, these sufferers make a poor armour (of a "defensive" or "compensatory" character) around their maimed inner core'.[25] Kohut himself 'has mentioned that his perform "overlaps" with Winnicott's investigations', and others have 'regarded Kohut's participation to psychoanalysis to be an expansion of Winnicott's work'.
Thus Kohut emphasises that 'to be...the servicing of even the infected remains of the self is much better not being, that is, to agree to the takeover of another person's personality rather than his definitely elicited responsiveness'. In the same way, he pressured that 'there is a major distinction between the assistance of selfobjects that are preferred and selected by a self in balance with its inner values...and the leaving of yourself to a international self, through which one benefits obtained communication at the cost of authentic effort and innovative participation in life'.
Alexander Lowen recognized narcissists as having a proper and a incorrect, or trivial, self. The incorrect self sets on the outer lining area, as the self provided to the globe. It appears contrary to the actual self, which exists behind the act or image. This true self is the sensation self, but it is a self that must be invisible and declined. Since the trivial self symbolizes distribution and complying, the inner or true self is edgy and upset. This actual revolt and rage can never be completely under management since it is an appearance of the lifestyle power in that individual. But because of the refusal, it cannot be indicated straight. Instead it reveals up in the narcissist's performing out. And it can become a perverse power.
Wayne F. Masterson
James F. Masterson suggested that all the personality conditions vitally include the problem between a person's two “selves”: the incorrect self, which the very toddler constructs to please the mom, and the actual self. The psychiatric treatment of personality conditions is an make an effort to put individuals returning touching their real selves.
Neville Symington
Jungians have researched how 'the narcissistic longings of moms (or fathers) to generate proven wonder through their children' can outcome in a scenario where 'in position of independence, the mature...would come to follow an inner resource that the psychoanalyst Neville Symington calling the "discordant source"'.[30] Symington compared 'two poles: one in which I am the resource of my own activity, where I have a innovative potential that comes from my own resource of activity, and the other in which an inner determine compared to myself is the resource of activity.[31] He known as the double 'sources of activity the "autonomous source" and the "discordant source"', and recognized that 'although the ingredients is different, it is along the collections of what Winnicott speaks about - the actual self and the incorrect self'.
His primary critique of Winnicott involved the preliminary adopting or internalisation of the discordant resource - seeking 'to pressure that an deliberate identification is what triggers the putting on of the incorrect self. Winnicott basically omits this deliberate element in his information of its origins'.
Alice Miller & Alice Burns (psychologist)
In contradistinction to the relatively positive studying of Winnicott, whereby 'the analytic process is to provide the "true self", which can experience and is cowering behind the "false self", which cannot, the durability to appear...like a butterfly separated from its chrysalis',[34] Alice Burns alerts more very carefully that 'it would be incorrect to suggest that there is a completely developed, true self knowingly invisible behind the incorrect self. The essential factor is that the kid does not know what he is hiding'.[35] She does however consider that, when 'the true self is liberated' efficiently, 'where there had been only afraid lonliness or similarly terrifying special dreams, an surprising prosperity of power is now discovered'.[36]
Susie Orbach: incorrect bodies
Susie Orbach saw the incorrect self as an overdevelopment (under parent pressure) of certain factors of the self at the cost of other factors - of the complete prospective of the self - generating thereby an abiding mistrust of what comes out automatically from the person himself or herself.[37]
Orbach went on to make Winnicott's consideration of how ecological failing can cause to an inner splitting of thoughts and body[38] so as to improve his concept of the False Self into that of the False Body - a falsified sensation of the own individual body.
Orbach saw the women incorrect individual body in particular as developed upon identifications with others, at the cost of an inner sensation of validity and stability. Separating a monolithic but incorrect body-sense in the procedure of treatment could allow for the appearance of a variety of authentic (even if often painful) individual body emotions in the person.
Jungian persona
Carl Jung
Jungians have researched 'to what level Jung's concept of the personality overlaps with Winnicott's concept of the False Self' - observing the way 'the antecedents of such persona-identification in the person's life-history are usually quite just like those of the False Self'.[42] However most would believe the fact that it is only 'when the personality is extremely firm or protecting...[that] the personality then produces into a pathological incorrect self'.[43]
Stern's tripartite self
In The Public Realm of the Infant, Daniel Strict regarded 'the sensation of actual communication (..."going on being", in Winnicott's term)' as essential to what he known as the Primary Self - offering 'an effective core to the prerepresentational self'. He also researched how particular expectant moms attunement could make 'two editions of truth....Language becomes available to ratify the divided and consult the blessed position of spoken reflection upon the incorrect self', so that 'the true self becomes a corporation unfortunatly of disavowed encounters of self which cannot be linguistically coded'.
However 'in position of true self and incorrect self, Strict indicates the adopting of a tri-partite vocabulary: the social self, the individual self and the disavowed self'.
#1 Literary examples
In I Never Guaranteed You a Increased Lawn, the heroine's specialist describes to her mom and father that 'she developed a software that went through the activities of truth, and behind it the actual individual attracted further and further away'. The heroine herself could only consider of "normality" with regards to the incorrect self as 'a lethargic freezing phantom flexing her every power to the Semblance'.
It has been recommended of Wuthering Levels that 'the interaction of the actual and incorrect self, and particularly the battle of the actual self to crack forth, make the actual intuitive dilemma of Brontë's novel'.
Foucault, a thinker, took problem with the concept of a “true self” on the reasons that the self was a build, not (as in the Loving paradigm) an essential to be uncovered: anti-essentialism. Foucault mentioned that "In the Californian conspiracy of the self, one is expected to find a person's true self, to individual it from what might unknown or push away it" - whereas for him what was in query was a procedure of subjectification, an appearance of self-formation.
Foucault handled that because "the self is not given to us....there is only one realistic consequence: we have to make ourselves as a perform of art".
See also:
Alter ego
Authenticity (philosophy)
Character mask
Crystallized self
Fantasy bond
Mask
Narcissism
Parentification
Psychology of self
Religious opinions on the self
Unthought known